And the study found that the annual salary of those students who rejected Ivy League universities is not lower than this number at all!
In other words, if a student is admitted to Princeton ranked #1 in the United States, but gives up and chooses to go to Northeastern University ranked #49, his future earning ability will still be the same as a graduate of Princeton University.
So, since the children’s own excellence is what matters, is it enough to just go to a Caichang primary school? Is school "useless" for children anyway?
"Good enough" is enough
In the past few years, many people were criticizing the "native family", which made the parents tremble, for fear that one day they scolded the child, it would leave him with a lifelong psychological shadow.
However, many studies have shown that those particularly bad families will indeed "destroy" children, but most of the families around us are actually good enough.
A psychologist at Yale University, said: “Parents only need to avoid violence, abuse, and not be indifferent. In addition, anything parents do will not cause a significant impact.”
Similarly, in the past few years, parents desperately gave their children tutoring classes, squeezed their heads to send their children to good primary and secondary schools, but in fact, Angrist’s research has proved that if the child comes from a middle-class family and the parents value education, then It doesn't matter whether you go to the TOP1 elite school or the school next door.
In the education of children, benefit of ballet for preschooler is very important, but "from 1 to 100" is not so important.
